When gameplay conflicts with a place of remembrance

A location-based AR game

Risk trigger

A location-based AR game automatically placed collection points, encounters and player incentives inside an atomic-bomb memorial area. The risk came from the real location, its commemorative purpose and the behavior encouraged by the game—not from translated wording.

What happened

During the game’s 2016 global expansion, memorial institutions and sites including an atomic-bomb remembrance area objected to visitors collecting virtual objects or gathering to play. The operator removed game points and spawns in response to requests, including changes sought before major remembrance events. Similar concerns at Holocaust memorial institutions demonstrated that location databases can carry cultural risk across markets.

Why it became a cultural risk

Memorials serve as places for reflection, mourning, and respect for victims of war or mass violence. Collecting items, earning points, taking photos, or gathering to play can conflict with that purpose, even without disrespectful intent. A place can carry profound meaning through historical trauma and collective remembrance as well as religion. Turning it into a location for collecting game resources can make remembrance feel like entertainment.

Public reaction and impact

The operator removed the affected points and encounters following requests, while memorial institutions asked visitors not to play. The case shows why AR and location-based services need procedures for identifying sensitive sites and responding promptly to removal requests.

Pre-release recommendations

  1. Identify locations that need special care, including memorials, cemeteries, disaster sites, hospitals, schools, religious sites, and places where ceremonies are taking place.
  2. Exclude high-risk locations before launch and provide site owners with a clear, responsive removal channel.
  3. Temporarily disable nearby content during anniversaries, funerals and commemorative events; check whether rewards draw crowds across a boundary.
  4. Audit player photography, social features, sponsored points and event routes alongside the base map, then recheck location changes over time.

Research basis and application

The analysis uses public statements from memorial institutions and contemporary reporting on requested removals. It should be applied through location-specific review: the response for one memorial does not automatically define every public place in Japan or elsewhere.

All cultural risk cases

Request the full cultural risk report.

Get the complete research report free of charge, with more case studies, assessment frameworks, and guidance for your team.

Request the free report

This opens a draft in your email app. Send the request there, and our team will reply with the report.

[email protected]